First off, one article by social justice activist and pediatric emerg physician Samir Shaheer-Hussein, a person who I admire so much for his down-to-earth demeanor and dedicated work on what I would consider some of the most important grassroots political campaigns in Montreal in the last 15 years. At a time when anti-Black police violence is getting a lot of attention in the U.S., he looks at how police violence against racialized people, and particularly youth can be understood as a public health issue for communities in the Canadian state context.
"When Will Police Stop Killing our Youth?" Huffington Post online, Jan 5, 2016
|drawn image, black/white/purple: portrait of Anas Bennis, 25 years old. Killed by Montreal Police in Côte-des-Neiges in 2005|
Secondly, this thing has been happening in Toronto that just confounds me. A local organization that employs harm-reduction outreach workers started doing a "pilot project" with the Toronto Police.
I'm going to back it up for people who aren't familiar with what it is that harm-reduction workers do in this city. I'm not an expert myself, here, but I think I can explain a little bit without misrepresenting too much.
Harm-reduction outreach workers are people who, among other things, go around distributing safer injection kits, and who aim to build, for lack of a better term, "caring" and/or "therapeutic" relationships with people using drugs and/or living in poverty/on the street/in precarious situations, etc. By using a harm reduction approach to building these relationships (non-judgement, seeing the person rather than their 'problems,' meeting the person where they're at) workers can become an important point of access for people who need various kinds of essential resources and services that they would otherwise have a really hard time getting or not be able to get at all (food, shelter, mobility devices, health care supplies and services, income support, legal services, etc etc etc).
Some of the workers are nurses, some have other kinds of backgrounds in organizing and supporting people and communities' health. This work requires a ton of specific knowledge and is highly skilled (though often not highly paid relative to other kinds of "professional" care work). Its effectiveness depends largely on how much trust workers are able to build with the people they are working with and for.
So. Along comes this "pilot project" that puts plainclothes police officers alongside harm-reduction outreach workers, without informing "clients" or the community in general about who they are and what their goals are. Can you see why this might create a problem? Might freak people out, and erode people's trust in the organization, its workers, and in street outreach workers generally (like, across organizations)? I sure can.
Anyway, this situation is still unfolding, and I, like most folks it seems, am in the process of learning what the hell is going on and why. Below I'm including a very general article from about a month ago when this issue first emerged in mainstream conversations:
"Drug harm reduction partnership with police irks Toronto outreach community" Metro News, Dec 28 2015.
Next is a very smart commentary from K. Lanktree about the mismatch of police and harm reduction, as it relates to the situation above:
"Police in Harm Reduction: A Recipe for Failure" Studio L, Dec 31, 2015
Finally, a blog post by community/health care worker Zoe Dodd that shares some of the details coming out of a public meeting with some representation from Toronto Police, John Howard Society and The Works, who are the three groups doing the "pilot project" together. This post contains some great analysis from the perspective of a community member and health/care worker as well as some details about how this project came into being, how it's funded, etc.:
"Reflections on Yesterday's Public Meeting and the Project - JHS, The Works - Toronto Police" Stark Reality (blog) Jan 9, 2016
Finally, a couple of my own words and more personal reflections:
I was in my first year of university in an intro political science class when I first encountered the definition of police as having a "monopoly on the legitimate use of violence" under the state system. As a white 18 year-old from a middle-class background, I was basically learning a concept that many people learn through experience at a much, much younger age and in far less safe, privileged environments. In any case, it might not have been 100% new information but it hit me hard with a new understanding in that moment (I could tell you the classroom I was in at the time and where I was sitting). I guess that's when I started to think more critically about the role of police in society, as necessarily agents of the state and as defenders of the status quo/social hierarchies.
In nursing school, the only time I can remember us talking about police/law enforcement was in the context of emergency mental health care, which kind of makes sense for reasons I'll hopefully make clear. A guest speaker whose name and role/job title I cannot remember for the life of me taught us about the "forms" used by law enforcement and medical institutions to legally detain people against their will under Ontario's Mental Health Act. (There's other legislation that relates to "treating" people medically without their consent/cooperation or against their will. But even without that piece, this is some heavy, complex stuff, legally and ethically. I'd encourage people to learn more about these things. I have some personal experiences with this system that I won't share for now.)
Anyway, the main thing I remember this guy saying was something to the effect of: "You (soon-to-be new nurses) must treat law enforcement like respected colleagues." The suggestion seemed to be that nurses (or new nurses?) are known for disrespecting cops, or treating them with hostility. I'm not sure how true this really is.
Now, I can understand that there are lots of situations in which, as a person providing/trying to provide health care to someone, it would be a wise and rational choice to treat a police officer with civility, assuming this is an option. I don't think this is the same thing as trusting them as a colleague, or even necessarily treating them as one.
The speaker's suggestion seemed to me to be that "we're all workers trying to do the same job", i.e. protecting a person's health and the safety/wellness of the people around them. I could think of some very hypothetical situations in which this could be true, I guess, and I'll let you decide for yourself if you think this is generally true after reading the articles and discussion posted above. I would just suggest that, however you go about considering this question, you think about your position and your privilege relative to police and the state justice system.
The whole thing made me start thinking about the role of police and law enforcement in health and health care more specifically. I don't have answers but this hasn't stopped me from asking questions.
Thoughts in progress. Thanks for reading this far. I welcome your good-faith reactions, feedback, criticisms, etc.
(here are the urls for the articles above in case the hyperlinks don't work for some people:)